At the Brod Law Firm, we are honored to work with brave individuals who come forward to report Medicare fraud. These admirable people help the government recover money that has been stolen from its coffers, ensuring the funds are available to the many honest Americans who rely on the program for their health care needs. In this post, we look at a ruling by a federal judge seated in California that discusses what needs to be alleged to bring a successful Medicare fraud claim. Attorney Brod, our office’s California health care fraud lawyer, believes in communicating closely with his clients and helping them to understand the law and the legal process. While it is not a substitute for meeting with our team (the first consultation is free), we hope this post helps readers begin to understand the complex law of Medicare fraud and the False Claims Act.
Former Employee Alleges Manipulation of Medicare Risk Scores to Increase Payments
A website aimed at executives in the health care industry (an unusual source for our blog, but one that provided useful coverage) reported on a ruling this summer in a whistleblower case alleging Medicare Advantage fraud. Medicare and Medicaid use a risk-scoring system, developed in the mid-to-late 200s, to adjust monthly payments. In 2009, Swoben, a former data manager for the SCAN health plan which serves California and Arizona, accused SCAN and other insurers of manipulating these scores. He claimed HealthCare Partners, a managed care group serving 570,000 patients in California, engaged in a scheme to artificially raise patient risk scores. According to Swoden, the insurer defendants knew that the group did not properly review codes and that an independent review actually concealed the fraud.